George Matthews
2020
The point of morality is to make the world a better place.
Happiness is the highest good, the ultimate aim of all human activity.
So an action is right to the extent that it promotes greater happiness and wrong if it leads to greater unhappiness.
The point of morality is to make the world a better place.
Happiness is the highest good, the ultimate aim of all human activity.
So an action is right to the extent that it promotes greater happiness and wrong if it leads to greater unhappiness.
The point of morality is to make the world a better place.
Happiness is the highest good, the ultimate aim of all human activity.
So an action is right to the extent that it promotes greater happiness and wrong if it leads to greater unhappiness.
Utilitarianism offers itself as a common sense solution to the problem of finding moral common ground.
We need not worry about the fact that we disagree on the content of a good life, since we all can agree that whatever it is that we are after in life, more satisfaction of our goals is always preferable to less.
"We are ruled by two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain."
"We are ruled by two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain."
"We are ruled by two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain."
"We are ruled by two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain."
"It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be a Socrates satisfied than a fool satisfied."
"It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be a Socrates satisfied than a fool satisfied."
"It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be a Socrates satisfied than a fool satisfied."
"It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be a Socrates satisfied than a fool satisfied."
Everything we do has costs -- time, effort, money, opportunity costs, etc.
The rational choice in any situation is the one with the best payoff -- the most favorable balance of benefits minus costs.
Everything we do has costs -- time, effort, money, opportunity costs, etc.
The rational choice in any situation is the one with the best payoff -- the most favorable balance of benefits minus costs.
Utilitarianism endorses this cost/benefit analysis model of rational choice as the basis of morality.
Everything we do has costs -- time, effort, money, opportunity costs, etc.
The rational choice in any situation is the one with the best payoff -- the most favorable balance of benefits minus costs.
Utilitarianism endorses this cost/benefit analysis model of rational choice as the basis of morality.
How might this work?
"I am a rational agent out to satisfy as many preferences as I can, if others also benefit that's great for them, but it's not really essential to me."
"I am a rational agent out to satisfy as many preferences as I can, if others also benefit that's great for them, but it's not really essential to me."
"I care about others and will set aside my own interests to help them satisfy their goals, since they count just as much as I do."
"I am a rational agent out to satisfy as many preferences as I can, if others also benefit that's great for them, but it's not really essential to me."
"I care about others and will set aside my own interests to help them satisfy their goals, since they count just as much as I do."
How might we convince someone with Dwight's attitude to adopt Pam's view?
The argument from maximization
The argument from maximization
Rational maximizers of self-interest seek the best possible outcome.
The more people who benefit from my actions the better the outcome.
So we should always strive to get the best outcome from the most people.
The argument from maximization
Rational maximizers of self-interest seek the best possible outcome.
The more people who benefit from my actions the better the outcome.
So we should always strive to get the best outcome from the most people.
The argument from maximization
Rational maximizers of self-interest seek the best possible outcome.
The more people who benefit from my actions the better the outcome.
So we should always strive to get the best outcome from the most people.
But why should I even care about other people getting what they want in the first place?
Rational actors are individuals and what we want to know is why individuals would ever find it more rational to set their interests aside.
The public defense argument
Suppose I selfishly cause harm to others for my personal gain.
I might get away with this, but what I can never do is convince others who know exactly what I am doing to let me get away with it.
Thus as long as rationality requires public defense, I have to accept that others count as much as I do.
The public defense argument
Suppose I selfishly cause harm to others for my personal gain.
I might get away with this, but what I can never do is convince others who know exactly what I am doing to let me get away with it.
Thus as long as rationality requires public defense, I have to accept that others count as much as I do.
The public defense argument
Suppose I selfishly cause harm to others for my personal gain.
I might get away with this, but what I can never do is convince others who know exactly what I am doing to let me get away with it.
Thus as long as rationality requires public defense, I have to accept that others count as much as I do.
Public accountability does seem to support the moral ideal that we all count.
Utilitarianism thus claims to have found a rational standard for measuring the morality of all actions -- do they genuinely serve the good of all or not?
A step by step guide
A step by step guide
A step by step guide
Utilitarianism as a moral philosophy is the claim that this is just what morality consists in: acting to get the best outcome for the most people by maximizing overall utility.
The right thing to do is whatever has the best consequences for everyone who is affected.
Morality would have an objective and rational basis.
The right thing to do is whatever has the best consequences for everyone who is affected.
Morality would have an objective and rational basis.
The more we all act ethically the happier we all will be.
The right thing to do is whatever has the best consequences for everyone who is affected.
Morality would have an objective and rational basis.
The more we all act ethically the happier we all will be.
The good that we do determines the rightness of our actions.
The right thing to do is whatever has the best consequences for everyone who is affected.
Morality would have an objective and rational basis.
The more we all act ethically the happier we all will be.
The good that we do determines the rightness of our actions.
"What's not to love about utilitarianism? Let's all work to get the best outcomes for the most people!"
"My love of making you do meaningless tasks is worth exactly 3.47 times the satisfaction you will get from visiting your sick grandmother."
"My love of making you do meaningless tasks is worth exactly 3.47 times the satisfaction you will get from visiting your sick grandmother."
"But I see things differently, so who are you to say?"
"My love of making you do meaningless tasks is worth exactly 3.47 times the satisfaction you will get from visiting your sick grandmother."
"But I see things differently, so who are you to say?"
How can we accurately measure and compare the amount of pleasure, benefit or utility different people get as a result of our actions?
"If you keep showing up late, I am going to have to let you go, it's for the good of the company."
"If you keep showing up late, I am going to have to let you go, it's for the good of the company."
"But if you fire me, I'll start drinking heavily and will eventually set fire to the whole building in an out of control drunken rage, so in fact it's better for the company to keep me."
"If you keep showing up late, I am going to have to let you go, it's for the good of the company."
"But if you fire me, I'll start drinking heavily and will eventually set fire to the whole building in an out of control drunken rage, so in fact it's better for the company to keep me."
How can we predict the consequences of our actions, and when do indirect, distant effects of what we do now no longer matter?
"What does market research show about what will happen to our sales if we act unethically?"
"What does market research show about what will happen to our sales if we act unethically?"
"Market research is expensive so I didn't bother to do any."
"What does market research show about what will happen to our sales if we act unethically?"
"Market research is expensive so I didn't bother to do any."
Gathering information about the likely consequences of our actions is another cost, so how can we tell when we have enough information to act?
"Even though I promised you a permanent job I had always intended to fire you after six months and replace you with someone I could pay less."
"Even though I promised you a permanent job I had always intended to fire you after six months and replace you with someone I could pay less."
"When I found out I became so disillusioned with a career in business that I started a non-profit helping to house the homeless, so it's all good -- no harm, no foul!"
"Even though I promised you a permanent job I had always intended to fire you after six months and replace you with someone I could pay less."
"When I found out I became so disillusioned with a career in business that I started a non-profit helping to house the homeless, so it's all good -- no harm, no foul!"
Can the good consequences of our actions really serve as an excuse for what might seem like unethical behavior?
"It is cheaper to be sued for product liability than it is to fix the problem so let's pretend we didn't know about it. Our profitability is beneficial to the economy!"
"It is cheaper to be sued for product liability than it is to fix the problem so let's pretend we didn't know about it. Our profitability is beneficial to the economy!"
"But isn't it wrong to knowingly put people in danger for the sake of profits?"
"It is cheaper to be sued for product liability than it is to fix the problem so let's pretend we didn't know about it. Our profitability is beneficial to the economy!"
"But isn't it wrong to knowingly put people in danger for the sake of profits?"
Do the ends really justify the means? Doesn't this reduce the value of human life to numbers on a spreadsheet?
"I'm going to have to ask you not to take any more weekends off, everyone one else needs your extra contributions to support their time off."
"I'm going to have to ask you not to take any more weekends off, everyone one else needs your extra contributions to support their time off."
"Don't I have the right to demand the same treatment as everybody else?"
"I'm going to have to ask you not to take any more weekends off, everyone one else needs your extra contributions to support their time off."
"Don't I have the right to demand the same treatment as everybody else?"
If the good outcomes of our actions determine whether they are right, doesn't that undermine the whole concept of rights?
However...
However...
However...
Its problems might leave us wondering whether this is all there is to moral decision-making?
Aren't there some limits to how we should treat each other than go beyond considerations of the beneficial outcomes that result?
Utilitarianism, Frank Aragbonfoh Abumere, Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics.
Utilitarianism: Act and Rule: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a comprehensive account including lots of discussion of contemporary versions of the theory.
Poverty and Our Response to it: in this Crash Course video, Hank Green discusses the morality of our responses to poverty and the work of a contemporary Utilitarian philosopher, Peter Singer.
Built with:
xarignan html presentation framework
Photos by:
Engin Akyurt, Anonymous, Stux and fcb981
editorial suggestions and comments: requires a (free) GitHub account.
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |